The Hidden Russiagate Target: Wikileaks

download.jpg

As events develop and more things are exposed things become clearer. The target for the intelligence community for Russiagate is not Trump. It is Wikileaks. The aim is to discredit the organization as nothing more than an agent of Russia in the eyes of the public. After all it does not matter how accurate the information they present is if the public thinks that Wikileaks is doing it to further Russian interests. With Wikileaks effectively eliminated the intelligence agencies lose the only effective check they have on their activities.

Note that I am not saying this is the goal of Democrats. They are sincere in their efforts to unseat Trump. Just like they would be in their efforts to unseat any republican elected. Manufacturing a crisis is the easiest way back to power for Democrats. The intelligence community is a separate from the Democrats and they have their own goals. The Democrats are just being used as useful idiots.

Trump

Under normal circumstances the intelligence community would not only be supportive of Trump they would be fiercely loyal to him. In many ways Trump is the perfect president for the deep state.

First off Trump is very results oriented. He does not particularly care about the methods used just as long as the objective is achieved. If the CIA were to torture 50 terrorists to save 5 american lives Trump would not have a problem with it and would even congratulate the agents while other presidents may have moral issues.

Second by this time Trump is already immune to the media and public pressure. He knows that a certain segment of the public will never support him and the media will always paint his administration in the worst light possible. If Homeland Security were to have a scandal under his term then he would not care very much and just call the media fake news.

Third because Trump is a larger than life character most of the attention is centered around him. Russiagate was always going to happen. If Cruz, Rubio, or any other Republican won the Democrats would still accuse them of being a puppet for Putin. The email issue started during the primaries which mean any Republican who made it to the general would have benefited from it. Russiagate is not a delusional response but a logical one. If you are working in the leadership of the Clinton campaign and managed to lose despite every conceivable advantage, double the war chest, a friendly media, establishment figures on both sides supporting you, and a third party candidate whose primary purpose was to draw votes away from Trump in Mcmullin you would have a very hard time finding a job afterwards. Russiagate is a defense mechanism for the leadership of the Clinton campaign after all they decided on it hours after the election ended. The difference is that the other Republicans would have reacted differently to it. Trump shines a spotlight on it. If the CIA were to effect a hostile takeover of Ukraine tomorrow and the plans leaked all over the media the American public would still be talking about Russiagate the next day.

Trump represents a perfect storm for the deep state of a president who does not care what methods they use and who focuses the publics attention on him making them care less about the deep state in the process. It is like having a blank check from to do what you will.

Wikileaks

While Trump can be a boon for the intelligence community Wikileaks represents a bigger threat. At the end of the day the deep state knows that whoever the president is they will still be around at the end of their 8 years. Trump, Rubio, Cruz, Clinton, Obama, or anyone else is not going to abolish any of the intelligence agencies so they can ultimately work with any of them.

Guantanamo Bay, Chelsea Manning, The Iraq war, The Afghanistan war, The detainee policies, Vault 7, and more. Wikileaks has proven to be the only entity who can effectively check the power of the various intelligence communities. It could very well be that Wikileaks has done more to limit the deep state than the GRU, Mossad, and every other foreign intelligence agency. Not only would the CIA, FBI, and other agencies lie in order to remove Wikileaks from the picture they would most likely kill to do so.

The Truth

The stakes are much higher than anyone realizes. We are not just discussing Trump or partisan politics anymore. What we are seeing is nothing less than the intelligence community or “deep state” eliminating any checks to their power.

Think of a future without Wikileaks. There is no organization which is currently capable of succeeding them in their function. It does not even seem like there is any with even just the potential to take over. Leakers would have nowhere to go. Traditional media would not dare do what Wikileaks does. If a organization does rise up to replace them all the intelligence communities would have to do is raise up some links to Russia or any other nation and they would be discredited by association to Wikileaks.

Without any organizations to check them the intelligence community can do whatever they want. We already have the Vault 7 releases which state that they can use tv sets to spy on people and are working on technology to obtain remote control of cars, which has been described as the perfect assassination tool. By supporting their drive to eliminate Wikileaks the intelligence community is essentially asking you to hand over complete control over to them with no oversight. There is very few things that are more terrifying than what the deep state is asking us to do.

His Name Was Seth Rich

5gzcn5aamxhx.png

His name was Seth Rich. The mainstream media is about to go into overdrive about a possible impeachment of President Trump. They are beginning to show their desperation as the Russian narrative is about to be broken. The only justification ever offered for the Russian collusion is that Russia hacked the DNC servers and gave the information to Wikileaks. If the information did not come from Russians then they would have done very little or nothing to help Trump.

Leak Vs. Hack

From the very start there has been very little discussion in the media about whether the information was leaked or hacked. The Democrats needed the information to be hacked to fit in with their Russian narrative and so it was a hack not a leak. Some of the DNC operatives have recently said in their new book that the Russian angle was determined right after Hillary lost the election. It makes sense as the Clinton team would need to find employment in the future and would need to justify why they lost a campaign and states that have not been lost for decades when they had twice the money the other campaign had. The fact that there was a possibility that it could have been a leak was not even discussed.

Make no mistake evidence does exist for both sides and it is not as one sided as it seems. On the one hand you have the intelligence community saying that it was a hack. Except that you don’t really have anyone on the intelligence community providing anything specific instead we have the press quoting some “anonymous sources” confirming that it was the Russian who gave the info to Wikileaks. I hope i do not need to tell anyone that blind trust in the intelligence community is not a good thing. Democrats seem to have forgotten the lessons taught by Iraq.

On the other hand you have Wikileaks. Julian Assange has consistently said that the information came from a leaker not a hacker. Wikileaks has a reputation as never having to recant any of the information they have given out. Even the DNC emails themselves were proven to be completely true. I am not advocating for blind trust for Wikileaks as well. Yet the only argument the left has for accepting the anonymous sources of the NYT is their reputations. Surely in that case the reputation of the organization with a 100% accuracy rating should be considered.

Motive

This next part is not discussed at all. In fact I may be the first person to point this out. If you pay attention to nothing else in this article please pay attention to the next sentence. The Intelligence Community has motive to discredit Wikileaks. I have bolded it for your convenience. Read the bolded sentence five times if possible. With the information given during Iraq, the Vault 7 release, Chelsea Manning and others Wikileaks has proven to be a very effective check on the powers of the government. The intelligence community would love nothing more than for Wikileaks to be tied to the Russians so that they would lose the trust of the American people. With no independent party to check them the intelligence community can go back to doing whatever they want.

Seth Rich

We now go to Seth Rich. According to his family, most of which are democrats and some of which are current democrat political operatives, Seth Rich was a lifelong committed democrat who loved Hillary and would never ever think of leaking to Wikileaks. Julian Assange on the other hand has been hinting heavily that his source was Seth Rich. He has offered a reward for information of the murder and has publicly stated that the operatives which gave him the emails put their life on the line doing so. Right after Rich was murdered. Of course Seth Rich is dead so we can attribute anything we want to him. His family can say that he would die before betraying Hillary Clinton and we can say otherwise. The only thing that matters is what he actually did. Anonymous sources as well as the investigator assigned to his case have stated that his computer forwarded 44000 emails from the DNC servers to Wikileaks. The exact amount of emails that have been published. The investigator has of course been silenced by the family of Seth and a confidentiality agreement but the questions still remain.

We now go to the murder of Seth Rich. This comes after emails from Podesta saying that they should make “examples” of the leakers. The murder of Seth Rich has been ruled as a “botched robbery”. This is very strange. In a robbery the primary motive is financial gain. In a botched robbery what usually happens is the items of value are stolen but the victim is killed in the process. In this case the victim was killed but everything of value was left alone. It is almost like the killer was not interested in them.

Bias

Given that the intelligence community has more motive to lie about Wikileaks than they ever did about Iraq. The credibility of Wikileaks itself. The suspicious murder of Seth Rich and the heavy insinuation from Assange that the leaker was Rich. The fact that the DNC denied the FBI access to their servers despite being sure of the hacking (why bother about your privacy when everything has been compromised anyway). Why exactly are we not even looking into the possibility that this was a leak and not a hack? Could the media have some sort of bias and are pushing their preconceived conclusion for their own ends?

If the media will not do their job then we will have to do it for them.

His Name Was Seth Rich.

Democrats Want Civil War Over Slavery: Again…

download.jpg

Four score and seven years ago, or however long ago the Civil War was, there was a Republican named Abraham Lincoln. He wanted to free the slaves and the democrats went crazy. They said President Lincoln was going to destroy their economy and way of life and said he was the most evil person in history. If Hitler were around at that time they would have used that comparison. Instead they compared him to the devil.

Fast forward to today. America is back to its old ways and we have developed another slave class. Just like in ancient Rome and the South of old these slaves were imported from their homes and made to work for the benefit of a foreign land. Along comes President Trump. Not only does he call for the country to free its slaves like President Lincoln did in the past but he goes a step further and calls for repatriation back to their homelands. As they did before the Civil War the left went crazy. They call President Trump Hitler, the devil, and other things. They grasp at straws at random unverified reports. Some even call for the declaration of martial law by the outgoing President. Sadly the country never learns. The democrats of old even use the same argument as the democrats of today.

Economy Needs Them

In the old South the slaves were needed to keep the plantations economically viable. The planters would not be able to make as much money using their cash crops if they had to pay someone an actual wage. Instead they had the slaves imported so they could get all the labor they want for the price of room and board. Not particularly pleasant room and board at that.

Today the democrats say the same thing. Who will pick strawberries at that low price? Who will pick our other produce? Who will work as our waiters , cooks, and other service jobs? We can’t afford to get rid of them and hire Americans as your prices will go up. The same exact argument was made then as it is now.

For their Own Greater Good

In the south the slave owners justified taking the slaves from their homes because it was for their own good. The countries that they stayed in are backwards and they would have no real opportunity in it. The slaves are taken care of here instead of being left to die. The crux of the argument was that it was for their best interests to be slaves.

We have the same argument today. We cannot let the slaves return home. They have opportunity in America that they do not in their home countries. They have to stay here as slaves to live a better life and they would be better taken care of than in their own country. There is no possible way that they could be skilled or talented enough to develop their home countries.  The same argument about how it is in the best interests of slaves.

Delegitimization

The south said that Lincoln was not a legitimate president. Due to state rights he had no power to take their slaves away from them. They promised mayhem, protests, and civil disobedience if he was elected. They walked out on their own party when freeing the slaves was discussed. They said that Lincoln could not have won if not for the split in the democratic party (the Northern Democrats and Southern Democrats). They claimed a majority of Americans did not support Lincoln as only 40% voted for him and 60% for someone else. Military officers claimed they would not serve under Lincoln and began preparations. Ultimately this led to secession.

Fast forward to President Trump. The EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS are used. Trump could not have won if not for the split in the democratic party (Berniecrats and Hillary Supporters). A majority of Americans did not vote for Trump as more voted for other candidates despite Trump winning the electoral college. Military officers claimed they would not follow Trump during the election. Sanctuary cities have declared that they will not follow orders by the Trump government just like the southern states. Like the democrats of old the democrats now act like this is the end of the world. We now reach the logical conclusion of some high profile democrats calling for martial law.

150 years and no change in their stance or rhetoric. At this point we have to ask ourselves. What is it with democrats and slavery?

Those Rascally Russians

images-1

We now have the next level in the attacks by the mainstream media against President Trump. Instead of the election being hacked to benefit him, it is now that Trump is a russian puppet because of all the compromising things Putin has on Trump. Notice this only happened when Trump gave a little ground on the Russian election hacking. The press immediately went on the offensive with this.

Let us take a look at the main allegations. First off it says that the Russians have been cultivating Trump for 5 years. 5 years. Let that sink in. If you asked anyone in 2014 Trump would have not have been in the top 10 of the next Presidents. Yet we are supposed to believe the Russians cultivated Trump in 2012.

Second we have the golden shower. According to the report we have Trump paying multiple prostitutes to pee either on him or on a bed that was used by President Obama in the Ritz. According to Paul Wood of the BBC not only does Russia have this material but Eastern European countries are aware of it as well. Eastern European countries who have the most to gain by an aggressive US policy towards Russia.

Let us take a look at the alleged incident. You have Trump. You have at the very least 2 prostitutes. You have a pimp or some other handler. You have whoever was with Trump as rich people don’t usually travel alone. You have the cleaning crew in the Ritz. You have whoever was managing them and you have the management and staff of the Ritz too. Trump is a very recognizable figure as well. All in all you have 10-20 people involved. Yet none of the various intelligence agencies can come up with a picture or video or anything like that? Only the russians can.

According to Paul Wood of the BBC the eastern european countries, he neglected to mention which, also have the information. Countries which have a vested interest in a hostile Russia-US atmosphere. You have France, Britain and Germany who have this interest as well. Not to mention the Chinese for whom a friendly US and Russia amounts to one of their nightmare scenarios. With all the people involved in the act itself and all the parties who would have benefited from a Clinton victory we did not have a single thing that came out before the election. But of course according to Paul Wood the CIA finds the accusations credible.

Lastly you have Mr. Cohen. President Trumps lawyer who was supposed to have been meeting Russian officials in Prague. Except his passport says that he was in the US at the time. We also have eyewitness reports placing him in the US as well. Yet Paul Wood says the CIA finds the intel credible.

None of the accusations make logical sense yet according to the media the CIA finds them credible.

At this point there is only one thing to do. The CIA and other government intelligence agencies must publicly reveal why they think this intel is credible and how they came to that conclusion. They must show the American people exactly how or denounce the information given by the media as false.

The intelligence has always said that they cannot do this because it would compromise sources. This argument no longer applies. According to these  allegations that the media says the CIA finds credible, you are about to have as commander in chief a person who is a puppet of the Russians. Trump will have the highest security clearance and will appoint various chiefs of his choosing. In that scenario your entire operation is compromised anyway. The media has painted itself into a corner in this one and I hope more and more people call on the CIA and other agencies to reveal all that they know or brand the media as liars.

The Hubris of the Irrelevant Press

mediadogs.jpg

Right after President Trump won the election you had the press screaming for more access. They were upset that he left his protective press pool to eat a steak and more recently to play a round of golf. The press have been demanding a press conference, more access to the president and his staff and a whole host of other things.

In a normal world this would seem to be reasonable. Yet this is not a normal world. We have had this very same press who is now demanding access compare Trump to literally Hitler for the past two years. This is the media which brought out woman after woman to paint Trump as a rapist one month before the election. The very same sages who declared Trumps campaign dead over and over again. The people who now discuss Russian hacking everyday on nothing more than the word of the Washington Post in an effort to delegitimize the victory of President Trump. This despite wikileaks founder Julian Assange repeating over and over again that their source was a leak and not a hack. Aside from Fox no other network has even mentioned this. It would be safe to say no other group has worked as hard as the media to ensure a Clinton victory. No other group of people would demand this many favors after putting so much effort into derailing a movement. The hubris is terrifying.

I do understand the argument that the media need to hold politicians accountable for their actions.  The media already has the first amendment which guarantees them the right to write anything they please. There is no constitutional guarantee of a comment or access. In fact with their liberal use of “unnamed sources” our press doesn’t seem to need it anymore. There are plenty of journalists who do not seem to need any access in order to perform their functions. The Young Turks, The Big Picture, and Secular Talk to name a few.

In a recent interview with Politico Joe Lockhart, Press Secretary for President Bill Clinton said that both sides stood to gain something in previous presidencies which is why the press and the presidency formed a symbiotic relationship and worked with each other. We find ourselves in a unique situation where the press has nothing of value to contribute to the Presidency. They had effectively destroyed themselves this election cycle.

There was a recent survey which said that mainstream media had a trust rating of less than 20%. Their very own readers do not trust them. If that is the case then what value do they provide?  It would be more effective for President Trump to reach out to the public directly via YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter as he has done. The media cannot even claim to have a greater reach than the President does as he has more combined followers for his social media platforms than their viewership. If their value is to hold power accountable then they cannot do that as well as nobody trusts them.

The press cannot even claim to provide an unbiased viewpoint. In another survey 77% of the American public, including 70% of democrats, felt that the press was biased in favor of Hillary Clinton while 6% felt that they were biased in favor of President Trump. Through wikileaks we find members of the press routinely submit their articles to the DNC for correction and that they routinely use their positions to either feed information to the DNC and its candidates or stack the deck against President Trump by asking the preferred questions of the DNC in debates and townhalls. You also see the media routinely trying to block any public investigation of the DNC such as when CNN famously declared that only the media were allowed to view the leaked emails. When the media has proven to be nothing more than the propaganda arm of the opposition party what is the use in giving them more access?

The media will continue to howl for more access throughout President Trump’s term. The question we have to ask is why?

How Do I Explain Trump To My Kids? : A Guide

e5d1912f-5bfb-42b7-bbb3-0e64ad28d38fnews-ap-org

Our friendly God- Emperor Trump is due to be confirmed by the electoral college today and liberals the world over are struggling to answer the question How do I explain Trump to my kids? It looks like it was first used by Van “Whitelash” Jones and then spun into a narrative by our main stream media.

Everyone should be concerned about how to explain Trump to their children so I compiled a list of talking points you can use. No need to thank me. I do this as a public service in the spirit of friendship.

  1. Obama failed so badly during his presidency that the people handed over control to a fascist and gave his party control over the presidency, congress, senate, supreme court, and even a majority of state governorships and legislatures. You can tell your child that Obama started off with a majority in the senate and house and won over 600 counties country-wide. After 8 years all of that was wiped out and 1/3 of the counties he won voted for Trump.
  2. Women are just not qualified for President. According to President Obama Secretary Clinton was the most qualified person to run for President ever. She lost to what the media describes as a “clown who likes to grab women by the pussy”. Not only did she lose. She lost while spending the most of any candidate in history and having the media collude with her. You should tell your children early on that women are just not qualified.
  3. RUSSIANS! Clearly invading Crimea and winning in Syria was not enough for Putin and he wanted a change from the Obama foreign policy. Scream Russians continuously to your kids to teach them hate early on.
  4. It’s a great victory! For years the left has been complaining about the corrupting influence of money in politics. Clinton raised 1.2 bn and massively outraised Trump in Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Trump raised 600m mostly from small donors and even had 7m left over at the end.
  5. People just didn’t understand how wonderful Clinton was. The voters are dumb and uneducated and they should have voted for her in droves. All the celebrities were for Clinton and how can they be wrong! Iron Man is pro Clinton!
  6. The biased main stream media just had it in for poor Hillary. CNN and MSNBC were openly rooting for Trump and Clinton just could not overcome that. They discussed her emails and foundation non stop! They even put out a fraudulent survey saying 77% of the US believed the media was biased in favor of Clinton and 6% in favor of Trump.
  7. Racism! The first Black president won and his successor lost because Americans were more racist towards Clinton than they were towards Obama. Teach your kids to abhor the white male early on!
  8. Fake News! Despite a stern warning from CNN online sites kept publishing Clinton’s emails. People have no authority to read this on their own and anyone who read the emails is a criminal. Tell your child Criminals caused Hillary to lose.
  9. People are unreasonable! They didn’t want to believe their jobs are not coming back period and that they need to get a different degree and sell their house and everything they own and move to a different state to try to get another job! It’s their fault Hillary lost.
  10. Bernie! He campaigned too long! He forced Clinton to collude with the DNC! He didn’t tell his supporters to vote for her enough. The lesson for your child is once the bosses decide who the candidate is you should just follow.

There you go! 10 easy to explain nuggets of wisdom for your toddlers when you explain to them why Hillary lost.